Friday, 28 March 2014

Drama Project Meeting Agenda 26/3/14


As a group we discussed on our groups facebook group what topics we need to discuss and aims which we need to achieve in the more near future which will benefit our drama film. The above picture is the information condensed down into a bullet point form which will be expanded in our next meeting.

Drama Film Treatment - 'Overdose'


Film Treatment

Title: ‘Overdose’

Genre: Short contemporary drama

Duration: 5-6 minutes

Main Characters:

Amber – young, Northern English, lower-middle class woman (20-25 Y.O). Been in a relationship and living with boyfriend Dean for 1-2 years. Struggling musician.

Dean – slightly older, Northern English, working class man (25-30 Y.O.) Small-time cocaine dealer paying for Amber’s expenses.

___________________________________________________________________________

Short Synopsis:

Amber knows that her boyfriend is a successful small-time drug dealer, but with her own career failing to provide she is forced to stay with him and turn a blind eye to his activities. As her personal life becomes increasingly embroiled in his dangerous operations, and menaced by the growing fear of being caught with him, she can no longer distance herself from the criminal lifestyle and must search for an escape. 

Narrative Development:

The film mostly takes place from Amber’s point of view within the confines of the house she shares with her boyfriend, the central focus being her growing feelings of fear, anxiety, entrapment and isolation.

At the start of the film we see a shot of Amber’s face, wide-eyed looking out of a car window – the glow of a bright blue light sweeping across her and a blur of indistinguishable movement visible in its reflection. Ambiguous sounds of shouting and sirens build to a crescendo as we cut to Amber and her boyfriend in a car. Thinking she was being driven to her parents’ house, Amber is told they are actually travelling to an unknown location to meet someone as part of an ‘important deal’.

Before they arrive we cut to the past where most of the narrative takes place – a series of elliptical scenes providing context about her situation and leading up to the car journey. We see Amber meet her boyfriend for the first time in a club, we see her being used as a courier as part of his operations, and we see his growing neglect and mental abuse of her as she confronts him about his growing disregard for trying to hide his criminal activities.

Early in the film Amber answers the door to an unknown person who is looking for someone she does not recognise. Later she sees someone looking in through her window and going round the back of her house, and in another scene a man invites himself in to search for something – representing in sequence the gradual intrusion into her own personal life. In one of the final scenes we see the effects of this on her character. She is sitting in the house in silence, alone and terrified of whoever might be coming – her boyfriend, his dangerous associates or the police.

The penultimate scene takes place at dusk. Amber’s boyfriend comes off the phone after speaking with an unknown caller who has given him a remote location to meet him at to deal drugs. He calls Amber down from the bedroom; she has brought her clothes with her thinking she is being taken to her parent’s house. As they enter the car, the story rejoins the first scene of the film and we see them arrive at the remote rural location. Her boyfriend gets out of the car, phones the dealer and looks around for them. As he turns, he sees Amber on the phone inside the car. He walks over to the locked car door and tells her to open it, to which she refuses.

We see a final shot of Amber’s face behind the glass window as her boyfriend tries to open the door, a long take which lasts until a slow fade to black and the end of the film. The sounds of sirens begin to fade up, and the flashing light of the police car flares across the image. We hear her boyfriend shouting as he tries to make his escape. The car door opens and an off-screen police officer asks if her name is Amber. It is revealed that she set up a fake deal with her boyfriend to get him caught, her only way of being able to leave that life behind for good.

Stylistic Choices:

With the story focusing mainly on Amber’s mounting feelings of fear, anxiety and entrapment we will use the stylistic choices in the film, camera-work, set design, sound design and editing to express these themes. The sound design will be particularly prominent, using ambiguous and ambient sounds to mirror Amber’s emotions at certain points in the film – for example when she is alone in the house and in the last shot of the final scene. Music used will be minimal and used sparingly to underscore scenes of little dialogue.

The cinematography will also be thoughtfully composed to emphasise the themes of the film. A rigid, still frame will be used for the majority of the shots to express the idea of entrapment, and elements of mise-en-scene and set design which perform similar functions will be focused on for their connotative meanings. For example, a recurring motif in the film of a blue light will be used to both express Amber’s fear of being caught by the police and to foreshadow the ending scene. To establish her boyfriend’s drug-dealing occupation, some shots will contain related paraphernalia such as scales and ‘baggies’.

To maintain focus on Amber we will frame her boyfriend so as to not reveal his full face throughout the film. We will also avoid using his real name, Dean, and create an ambiguous identity for him by having the other people he meets call him by a number of different street names. We will communicate their relationship through their actions and behaviour; having him touch her thigh in the first scene for example to show both affection and control over her.

With the majority of the film taking place in Amber’s house, the set design and lighting of the location will be important. The house will have little in it besides for some basic furniture and some expensive electrical equipment as an indication of the payout from her boyfriend’s lucrative job. The floor and walls would likely be bare or worn to create an unsettling atmosphere, and most surfaces untidy and containing items relating to his criminal occupation. As a retreat from the business taking place downstairs, the upstairs bedroom would contain personal touches made by Amber, lights around a mirror, small photographs on a wall, a house plant, her instrument etc.

The house interior will have a low quality of light, casting shadows in some parts of the rooms which would mirror the darker themes of the film and express Amber’s feelings of entrapment in her life. This would contrast greatly with the remoteness and greenery of the rural environment at the end of the film, symbolising her freedom having finally escaped her old life.

Concluding Comments:

The film we have proposed fits the brief of ‘Journey’ well in both the literal sense of the car journey at the start and end of the film and the metaphorical sense in the development of Amber’s emotions and feelings throughout the film. Although simplistic in the characters and locations used, the film explores the interesting psychological impact of a relationship with a criminal as well as a number of broader themes such as fear, entrapment and secrets.

Drama Idea and Pitch Presentation


Thursday, 6 March 2014

Equipment List

x2 - Canon XF100
Canon WD-H58W Wide Angle Lens for Canon XF100
x2 - Standard Film/Video Tripod
Zoom H4N
Audio Technica AT8015
Lapel Mic
x2 - Headphones
Boom Pole
Dedo DLH4 Lighting Kit

Pre-Production Group Meetings


 
 
The Following images were taken at a Pre-Production group meeting. We pitched our ideas and thoughts, and developed these ideas working as a team using all of our input. Team morale has been extremley strong and our convergence has developed our documentary idea.
 



Sound List


THE POSTE HOUSE PUB

·         General Atmos: E.g. Chatter, poured pints etc. (H4N ZOOM Stereo MICs)

·         Interview Dialogue (In Camera Lapel MIC attached to interviewee + H4N ZOOM boom MIC)

LIVERPOOL CITY CENTRE STREETS

·         Morning/Day/Night Atmos - For the establishing shots (H4N ZOOM Stereo)

·         Traffic (H4N ZOOM Stereo)

·         Ferry Horn (H4N ZOOM Stereo)

MICHAEL UNGER INTERVIEW

·         Walking interview on Upper Stanhope Street (In Camera H4N ZOOM boom MIC)

·         Sit Down Interview (In Camera Lapel MIC attached to Michael + H4N ZOOM boom MIC)

MIKE ROYDEN INTERVIEW

·         Sit Down Interview (In Camera Lapel MIC attached to Mike + H4N ZOOM boom MIC)

RADIO CALL INTERVIEW

·         Producer: Josh Walker on the phone interview (In Camera Lapel MIC attached to Producer + H4N ZOOM boom MIC)

Contact List for Crew and Contributors

Contact List For Crew

Joshua Walker - 07545636284
Tom Noonan - 07985786971
Joshua Prentice - 07597613117
Leanne Perry - 07768475632
Harry Miller - 07917331788
Amy Parker - 07749766180

Contact List For Contributors

Michael Unger - 07976732692
- 0151 3538620
Mike Royden - 07792313675
Stephan Duggan (Landlord Poste House Pub) - 07860373215
Poste House Pub - 23 Cumberland Street,
                               Liverpool,
                               L1 6BU.
                            - 0151 236 4130

Shooting Schedule

Monday 17th
19:00 PM-22:00 PM – Poste House Pub Interview Stephen Duggan (Landlord) + Jackie (Bar Maid) + Elderly Regulars
Tuesday 18th
8:00AM-10AM – BBC Radio Merseyside - Breakfast Radio Phone In Interview (our announcement)
11 AM-14:00 PM – Michael Unger (walking interview) 102 Upper Stanhope Street, Lime Street Station, Albert Docks
14:00 PM-16:00 PM – Michael Unger (sit down interview)
17:00 PM-18:00 PM –Liverpool Echo Journalist (sit down interview)

Team A - 19:00 PM-20:30 PM - Mike Royden (sit down interview in Chester)
Team B - 19:00 PM-21:00 PM - Night Location Shots and Atmos

Wednesday 19th
9:00 AM-15:00 – Location Shots
(Also, any last minute appointments whilst filming in Liverpool will be scheduled in on Wednesday).

Key:
Team A - Joshua Walker, Tom Noonan and Joshua Prentice
Team B - Nathaniel Weary, Amy Parker, Leanne Perry and Harry Miller

Developed Treatment - Adolf Hitler In Liverpool 1912 Investiagation

 
Synopsis:

When you think of Liverpool, you think of The Beatles, The Cavern, Anfield and the ferry across the Mersey. But what if I told you, that Adolf Hitler took that ferry, cheered for Liverpool on the terraces and had a pint listening to the music of the day. Sounds like a Monty Python sketch? Well we believe it’s true! But to tell this story, we’ve got to take a time ride back to before the start of the First World War in November 1912, when Adolf visited his half brother, at a flat in Toxteth.

For decades there’s been a suggestion that a 23 year old Adolf Hitler lived in Liverpool for 6 months, between November 1912 and April 1913. And after extensive research speaking to respected historians, authors and journalists, our production team will launch a documentary investigation in attempt to uncover whether Adolf Hitler once walked the streets of Liverpool.

Interviewees:

Michael Unger - (Former Editor of the Liverpool Echo and Liverpool Daily Post, More importantly the Author of the book ‘The Hitler’s of Liverpool’ and he Illustrated Bridgett Hitler’s memoirs)
- Walking Interview outside 102 Upper Stanhope Street, Liverpool Lime Street, and the Liverpool’s Dock.

Mike Royden– (Liverpudlian Historian)

-Argue for the story, that Adolf did live in Liverpool in 1912.

Professor Frank McDonough – (Author, Historian specialising in Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich)

-Argue against the story that Adolf did not live in Liverpool.

Stan Boardman – (Liverpudlian Comedian popular in the 1970s. Famous for his German jokes: The ‘Fokker’ joke and his World Cup song “The Germans Bombed Our Chippy”).

-Add comic value to the documentary. Liverpudlians love a tall tale. Interesting to listen to his comments and feelings about Hitler supposedly living amongst them in 1912 then going on to bomb Liverpool along with Stan Boardman’s families chip shop.

Stephen Duggan and Elderly regulars at the pub – (Stephen is the Landlord at the Poste House Pub on Cumberland Street where it is claimed that Adolf Hitler drank beer at) –

Aim

Explain why the claims have been made, exploring both sides of the debate as evenly as possible presenting the topic openly to the information we obtain. Create a natural response in the audience that, depending on our findings, will be predominately unbiased.

Inspiration

Intimate interviews through Camerawork – Impressed by the low key lighting and effective combination of static mid shots and panning close ups during the interviews seen in the documentary “Band Of Brothers” we intend to attempt to create a similar tone to our interviews.

Emotionally engaging with integrity through diverse sources - The stylish yet incredibly intricate presentation of information in Nick Broomfields: “Biggie and Tupac”, could be influential in creating a sense of mystery throughout our work.

Execution

With help from various research, a diverse number of sources and interviewees, the documentary will form as an informative yet artistic and emotionally aware piece. Already with massively intriguing content, we would like to enhance the viewers experience by approaching the production of the film in a acutely stylistic manner. This would be in order to create an entertaining and seductive build of curiosity through aesthetically pleasing use of cinematography and editing, All of this would hopefully provide an emotional attachment for the audience, to draw their focus not only to the curiosity and bewildering uncertainty that surrounds the topic, but to that of the element of folklore and myth upon which some Liverpudlian tales seem to thrive. We would like it to express a sense of skill within our filmmaking, to show not only the contents interest, but also the value we place as filmmakers in making a film about it.

Group Roles


Hitler in Liverpool:

Production Team organisation and planning

 

With roles assigned, a brilliant group dynamic established and a fantastic idea it seems logical to have the different roles put forward their own pieces of planning in order to create a well-rounded piece and a smooth filming process.

 

Group

 

1.    Although the list below seems to split work and dissociate the group don’t worry, working together as much as we can is important but having some independent tasks is useful to sharing the workload.

2.    I know you know most of it.

3.     GET INVOLVED – We know the idea is solid (Nice one Josh) grafting together, working together coming up with ideas together and helping each other in all aspects will help our piece leaps and bounds but bear in mind if someone knows what they are doing or is developing a good idea don’t stomp it down unreasonably or without a reasonable argument – nothing is just ****.

4.    This is not trying to put unnecessary pressure on anyone, if you don’t think we need some of things listed that’s fine, but the documents I have listed would be useful to our grades if made at some point whether it falls on the groups shoulders or not, this is more a template to be discussed at the meeting tomorrow. 

5.    Liverpool Timetable – We need to communicate with each other so we effectively use the time we have.

6.    STYLE, STRUCTRE AND TONE – This needs to be a consensus of the group through mind mapping and brain storming from influences if we all agree how we want it, the more likely we can create it.

 

 

Josh. W. – Producer

 

1.    Schedule – With contacts and access to information of potential interviewees/landmarks. Create a small and concise document with names, contact numbers and likely filming locations. Contacts could be made establishing whether we have permissions to film and after discussion with Leanne we could assign filming slots and times.

2.    Ideas Man – The concept as a whole it is important that as a group we achieve as much as we can what you intended, if at any point he idea is losing its originality or essence of which was aimed for in the first place, voice it.

3.    General Help – The more quickly we can set up and edit the better.

 

Nathan – Editor

 

1.    Familiarity – Editing is the quietest of the roles at this stage, and the loudest in post as we all know from hours spent near anxiety attack or passing out in the editing room.

2.    Despite this please vocalize opinions and research as to what we are capable of in editing and typical conventions of documentary, it will be incredibly useful to avoiding these panic attacks (can we obtain archive footage/where from/best sources/stylistically what editing style is going to match our piece)

3.    IMPORTING FOOTAGE – By no means am I saying you are not aware of how to do this, but for the sake of sakes lets have the method prepared when the footage connects to the mac, I saw too many people (including myself) who did this incorrectly, lost ease of use, work flow, quality and sometimes even whole segments of footage because importing was done incorrectly.

4.    Pace and Message – You and Harry will have a great deal of control over how the subject and the story comes across, essentially it is on both of you as to what the audience will believe or feel during the documentary. During meetings get an idea of how fair we want to present the argument and how accurately we want to represent our interviewees opinions.

 

Leanne - A. Director

1.    Creative insight – People are going to listen to you, we need you to stop of us from running away with our ideas and thinking we have a massive budget whilst pushing us further when we are almost on a solid idea.

2.    Motivate – The trip is going to be a mix of ideals, some groups I imagine are going to work unreal amounts, others I imagine are going to end up falling too heavily into a Liverpool club or bar and end up meeting their contacts 4 hours late the next day, Leanne kick us constantly, if you think we are slacking or being unprofessional make us aware, the more effective we are as a team the more comfortable the filming process and interviewees will feel, the more we get done the more we can get ourselves inebriated.

3.    Keep us together – Creative contention and tension is a natural thing, we might get stressed out, exhausted, aggravated, hate each other (for little moments) at these times remind everyone we’ve ended up in a really good group with a great idea and everyone is generally lovely.

4.    Logistics – Although this will be clearer after a demo run and information regarding locations and timing from Josh if you could assess timing it would be very useful. We will be under constant pressure when we are there, we will all want lots of information and footage however we need to be in the right places at the right time: How far are the different locations? Travel time? How long do we need for an interview to accumulate enough useful footage for a 5 minute film? How long will it take to set up and move equipment?

 

Amy  - Cinematographer

 

1.    Know the camera – I’m not saying you don’t but being able to set up quickly and execute shots well will be really beneficial.

2.    Awareness of visual style – Be solid on the aesthetic you want, if you think something has merit push it.

3.    With group agreement and discussion it is most important that you know what kind of material we are following the foot steps of, shots needed etc.

4.    Storyboarding/Shot list – I’m sure this will take place during group meetings but if they do not appear during meetings they are incredibly helpful and show good pre-production skills.

 

Joshua. P. – Sound Recording 

 

1.    Big Boom – Again I’m sure you’re solid but familiarity with the equipment, powering, technique is going to be key, especially if we decide to use all the microphones available to us, but that is on you. The interviews need to sound crisp and be synced perfectly (Clapper board)

2.    Sound List – Atmos is going to be all over the place, city sounds/bars/university/buildings/streets. Having a diverse range of sounds will make the documentary have a richer and more involving tone for the audience, being aware of the sounds we need.

3.    Demos with me and Amy – Us three (with help from the group) need to be able to set up as efficiently and effectively as possible, with as little snags as possible.

 

 

 

 

 

Harry – Sound Editing

 

1.    In communication with Nathan, structural awareness and exploring new techniques will be good, overlaying sound on different footage (interviews over location shots or archive footage etc)

2.    Pace and Message – You and Josh will have a great deal of control over how people and the story comes across, essentially it is on both of you as to what the audience will believe or feel during the documentary, during meetings get an idea of how fair we want to present the argument and how accurately we want to represent our interviewees opinions.

3.    Soundtrack ideas – Consider the tone of our piece and where it is going in terms of mood and

 

Tom Noonan – Director

 

1.    Attempt to keep the group as creatively in tune as possible, listen to everyone’s ideas and try to establish what the desired dynamic is.

2.    Organization – Organise the group into fair working positions where we can all come together to create work we are happy with. Essential to listen to everyone and establish we are working fairly and no one feels the group is not working effectively.

3.    Tell the director if he's being unreasonable, taking hold of the project too much – some directors seem to think that all control is with them purely because of the name, I disagree with this entirely and although think they are vital to the team it is those around them that make a piece of work what it is, the directors should stylistically influence the piece.

4.    Communication – keep in contact with everyone and organise various work, photos and timing so things run smoothly and everyone has information to put on their blog and examples of the work they are doing.

5.    Equipment Check list and Organisation

6.    Help anywhere I can

7.    Creatively travel the documentary.

Structure and Tone - Initial Guidline

This was the initial Guidline which we used whilst filming as a basis to structure and set the tone of the piece.
 

First Act – Although this will be subject to change dependent on information we obtain it is important to feel comfortable with how the piece will develop. In the first segment of the film (1st Minute) location must be established, using shots of Liverpool landmarks, archive footage plus images of Hitler. This will coincide and a combination of city sounds and sounds found on archive footage (fades and awareness of sound levels and what is in the frame will be key to making this sound professional. This will then be intercut with interviewee footage containing different answers to the question “When did you first hear of Hitler being present in Liverpool in 1912? This establishes the focus of the documentary and instigates enigma to draw in the audience. This will continue using cut always of location and archive possibly including a stylistic use of title for the documentary.

 

Second Act – Focus on content. Using Michael Unger's explanation of the event will provide strong evidence and an interesting location. This will be intercut with pub interviews setting the information’s tone with integrity (professional historian) whilst simultaneously emphasizing the sense of folklore and mystery that comes with the unsolved story (Pub goers). At this stage an argument will have begun to develop, depending on editing style this should provide a closed off or open-ended argument. Following this cohesively will tie onto interviews of Echo journalists and footage of the crew at the radio station. This seems a good precursor to the final act and will be interesting in terms of reliability, assessing how the information of Journalists stacks up against a Historians and locals.

 

Third Act – With the content explored and debate raised, depending on our feelings towards the information we obtain, leaving the audience to decide their verdict or continue there own exploration would match the tone set by the mysticism of folklore. Leaving an ambiguous ending using interviewees answering the question “did it really happen?”, would onset and present a diverse range of opinion. This will allow the audience to use their own interest and intellect to decide whose information in the film was the most reliable, hopefully creating a pleasant viewing experience that keeps the audience questioning how information can be distorted and changed and giving them an opinion on our subject matter “Did Adolf Hitler really go to Liverpool”

Interview Process and Questioning

Guidline Questions for Each Interview


Mike Hungar Questions

 

1)    Where did you originally find the story?

2)    What fascinates you about Hitler?

3)    What do you believe to be the most conclusive evidence suggesting Hitlers stay in Liverpool?

4)    Do you believe the information and research at hand today leads to a reasonable conclusion or is more needed?

5)    Over a century since the event supposedly took place to you feel too much information has been manipulated to develop a reasonable assessment?

6)    Writer of Hitlers Memoirs Sir Ian Kershaw stated this in an email to us when we attempted to get him to participate in the documentary “HE DID NOT VISIT LIVERPOOL AT ANY TIME” do you believe his opinion has weight?

7)    The bombings of his supposed home on Stanhope Street has raised many questions, supposedly the level of military accuracy taken to deliver that strike is implausible, was it just chance?

8)    Has the spirit of Liverpool tale telling exaggerated the truth?

9)    When presented with all the information you have obtained or know of, are you 100% sure of the stories truth?

10)  Do you think it’s true?

 

Local Liverpool Radio and Journalists

 

1)    Where did you originally hear the story of Hitler coming to Liverpool in 1912?

2)    Why has the topic received so much debate but still remains a mystery?

3)    Was any information lost that could have solved the ongoing ambiguity?

4)    Has it been too long since the event took place for a realistic conclusion to be made?

5)    From a Journalists perspective, what do you find the most likely truth to be?

6)    Why did the story interest you?

 

Guide Line Questions (Pub interviewees and public)

 

1)    When did you first hear of Hitler coming to Liverpool?

2)    What is it that interested you about the tale?

3)    Did you know anybody from Liverpool who claimed to have seen or known any of the Hitlers?

4)    Do you have or know of any information that suggests that the claim is true?

5)    Do you have or know of any information that suggests the claim is false?

6)    Do you think it’s true?